Appearance
question:A former government official, who is now consulting for a solar energy company, is tasked with optimizing the company's solar panel installations across multiple states. Each state has its own specific regulations that affect the efficiency and cost of solar installations. The official must leverage their deep knowledge of these regulations and connections within regulatory agencies to maximize the net efficiency of installations.Sub-problem 1: The solar energy company is planning to install solar panels in three states: A, B, and C. The efficiency of solar panels is affected by local regulations, which impose limits on installation density. The efficiency ( E_i ) in each state ( i ) (where ( i ) corresponds to A, B, or C) is given by the formula:[ E_i = frac{P_i}{D_i^{a_i}} - R_i ]where ( P_i ) is the potential power output without regulations (in MW), ( D_i ) is the installation density (in panels per square mile), ( a_i ) is a regulatory factor unique to each state, and ( R_i ) is the regulatory cost (in MW) due to compliance. Given that ( P_A = 100 ), ( P_B = 120 ), ( P_C = 90 ), ( a_A = 0.5 ), ( a_B = 0.6 ), ( a_C = 0.7 ), ( R_A = 10 ), ( R_B = 15 ), ( R_C = 12 ), and the regulatory agencies have mandated that ( D_A = 50 ), ( D_B = 40 ), ( D_C = 60 ), calculate the total efficiency ( E_{total} = E_A + E_B + E_C ).Sub-problem 2: The former official can consult with their regulatory connections to adjust the regulatory factors ( a_i ) in each state by a small amount to increase efficiency. If changing ( a_i ) by 0.1 units results in a 5% increase in efficiency, determine the new total efficiency ( E_{new_total} ) if the official manages to decrease each ( a_i ) by 0.1 units. Assume the new regulatory factors are ( a_A' = a_A - 0.1 ), ( a_B' = a_B - 0.1 ), and ( a_C' = a_C - 0.1 ).
answer:To solve the problem, we'll address each sub-problem step by step.Sub-problem 1: Calculate the total efficiency ( E_{total} = E_A + E_B + E_C ).We are given the efficiency formula for each state:[ E_i = frac{P_i}{D_i^{a_i}} - R_i ]We have the following parameters:- For State A: ( P_A = 100 ), ( D_A = 50 ), ( a_A = 0.5 ), ( R_A = 10 )- For State B: ( P_B = 120 ), ( D_B = 40 ), ( a_B = 0.6 ), ( R_B = 15 )- For State C: ( P_C = 90 ), ( D_C = 60 ), ( a_C = 0.7 ), ( R_C = 12 )Calculate ( E_A ):[ E_A = frac{100}{50^{0.5}} - 10 ]First, compute ( 50^{0.5} ):[ 50^{0.5} = sqrt{50} approx 7.071 ]Now, calculate ( E_A ):[ E_A = frac{100}{7.071} - 10 approx 14.142 - 10 = 4.142 ]Calculate ( E_B ):[ E_B = frac{120}{40^{0.6}} - 15 ]Compute ( 40^{0.6} ):Using a calculator, ( 40^{0.6} approx 9.189 )Now, calculate ( E_B ):[ E_B = frac{120}{9.189} - 15 approx 13.058 - 15 = -1.942 ]Calculate ( E_C ):[ E_C = frac{90}{60^{0.7}} - 12 ]Compute ( 60^{0.7} ):Using a calculator, ( 60^{0.7} approx 14.696 )Now, calculate ( E_C ):[ E_C = frac{90}{14.696} - 12 approx 6.122 - 12 = -5.878 ]Calculate the total efficiency ( E_{total} ):[ E_{total} = E_A + E_B + E_C = 4.142 - 1.942 - 5.878 ][ E_{total} = -3.678 ]Sub-problem 2: Determine the new total efficiency ( E_{new_total} ) after reducing each ( a_i ) by 0.1.The new regulatory factors are:- ( a_A' = a_A - 0.1 = 0.5 - 0.1 = 0.4 )- ( a_B' = a_B - 0.1 = 0.6 - 0.1 = 0.5 )- ( a_C' = a_C - 0.1 = 0.7 - 0.1 = 0.6 )Since changing ( a_i ) by 0.1 units results in a 5% increase in efficiency, we multiply each ( E_i ) by 1.05:Calculate the new efficiencies:[ E_A' = 1.05 times 4.142 = 4.3491 ][ E_B' = 1.05 times (-1.942) = -2.0391 ][ E_C' = 1.05 times (-5.878) = -6.1719 ]Calculate the new total efficiency ( E_{new_total} ):[ E_{new_total} = E_A' + E_B' + E_C' = 4.3491 - 2.0391 - 6.1719 ][ E_{new_total} = -3.8619 ]Final Answer: The final answer is (-3.8619). I hope it is correct.
question:An up-and-coming performer is planning a series of concerts in different cities with the aim of maximizing their exposure and gaining a breakthrough in the industry. The performer has the option to perform in two types of venues: small venues with a seating capacity of 500 people and large venues with a seating capacity of 2000 people. The performer has access to a dataset that provides the probability of filling each venue to a certain percentage based on historical attendance data, which is modeled by the following probability density functions:1. For small venues, the probability density function of filling x% of the venue is given by ( f(x) = frac{1}{50} e^{-frac{x}{50}} ) for ( x geq 0 ).2. For large venues, the probability density function of filling y% of the venue is given by ( g(y) = frac{1}{100} e^{-frac{y}{100}} ) for ( y geq 0 ).Sub-problem 1: Calculate the expected number of attendees for a single concert in a small venue and a single concert in a large venue. Assume the performer will perform one concert in each type of venue.Sub-problem 2: The performer decides to perform a tour consisting of 10 concerts, half in small venues and half in large venues. Assuming the expected number of attendees calculated in Sub-problem 1 for each concert, determine the expected total attendance for the entire tour.
answer:To solve the given problem, we will tackle each sub-problem step by step. Sub-problem 1: Calculate the expected number of attendees for a single concert in a small venue and a single concert in a large venue.# Small Venue:1. Probability Density Function (PDF) for Small Venue: [ f(x) = frac{1}{50} e^{-frac{x}{50}} ] where ( x geq 0 ) represents the percentage of the venue filled.2. Expected Value Calculation: The expected value of the percentage filled, ( E[X] ), is given by: [ E[X] = int_{0}^{infty} x cdot f(x) , dx = int_{0}^{infty} x cdot frac{1}{50} e^{-frac{x}{50}} , dx ]3. Substituting ( u = frac{x}{50} ), then ( du = frac{1}{50} dx ), so ( dx = 50 , du ): [ E[X] = int_{0}^{infty} 50u cdot e^{-u} cdot 50 , du = 2500 int_{0}^{infty} u cdot e^{-u} , du ]4. The integral (int_{0}^{infty} u cdot e^{-u} , du) is a standard result equal to 1: [ E[X] = 2500 times 1 = 2500 ]5. Expected Number of Attendees in Small Venue: The venue capacity is 500 people. [ E[text{Attendees}] = frac{E[X]}{100} times 500 = frac{2500}{100} times 500 = 1250 ]# Large Venue:1. Probability Density Function (PDF) for Large Venue: [ g(y) = frac{1}{100} e^{-frac{y}{100}} ] where ( y geq 0 ) represents the percentage of the venue filled.2. Expected Value Calculation: The expected value of the percentage filled, ( E[Y] ), is given by: [ E[Y] = int_{0}^{infty} y cdot g(y) , dy = int_{0}^{infty} y cdot frac{1}{100} e^{-frac{y}{100}} , dy ]3. Substituting ( v = frac{y}{100} ), then ( dv = frac{1}{100} dy ), so ( dy = 100 , dv ): [ E[Y] = int_{0}^{infty} 100v cdot e^{-v} cdot 100 , dv = 10000 int_{0}^{infty} v cdot e^{-v} , dv ]4. The integral (int_{0}^{infty} v cdot e^{-v} , dv) is a standard result equal to 1: [ E[Y] = 10000 times 1 = 10000 ]5. Expected Number of Attendees in Large Venue: The venue capacity is 2000 people. [ E[text{Attendees}] = frac{E[Y]}{100} times 2000 = frac{10000}{100} times 2000 = 20000 ] Sub-problem 2: Determine the expected total attendance for the entire tour.1. Number of Concerts: - 5 concerts in small venues - 5 concerts in large venues2. Expected Total Attendance: [ text{Total Expected Attendance} = 5 times 1250 + 5 times 20000 = 6250 + 100000 = 106250 ]Final Answer: The final answer is 106250. I hope it is correct.
question:As a local meteorologist in Alabama, you are studying the impact of temperature fluctuations and precipitation patterns on crop yields. Alabama's weather can be highly variable, making accurate predictions challenging.1. Temperature Fluctuation Analysis: The average daily temperature ( T(t) ) in Alabama during the summer months can be modeled by a sinusoidal function given by ( T(t) = A sin(omega t + phi) + B ), where ( A ), ( omega ), ( phi ), and ( B ) are constants, and ( t ) is the time in days. If the maximum temperature of the summer is 95°F and the minimum temperature is 70°F, and the period of the temperature cycle is 30 days, determine the values of ( A ), ( omega ), ( phi ), and ( B ). Additionally, calculate the maximum rate of temperature change during the summer.2. Precipitation Pattern Analysis: Suppose the cumulative precipitation ( P(t) ) over t days in a particular month can be represented by the integral of a Gaussian function: ( P(t) = int_0^t frac{C}{sqrt{2pi sigma^2}} e^{-frac{(x - mu)^2}{2sigma^2}} , dx ), where ( C ), ( mu ), and ( sigma ) are constants. Given that the total precipitation for the month (30 days) is 5 inches, the peak precipitation occurs at day 15, and the standard deviation of the daily precipitation is 5 days, find the values of ( C ) and ( mu ). Additionally, determine the day with the highest daily precipitation.
answer:Let's solve the problem step-by-step. 1. Temperature Fluctuation AnalysisThe average daily temperature ( T(t) ) in Alabama during the summer months is given by:[ T(t) = A sin(omega t + phi) + B ]# Finding Constants ( A ), ( omega ), ( phi ), and ( B ):1. Amplitude ( A ): The maximum temperature is 95°F and the minimum temperature is 70°F. The amplitude ( A ) is half the difference between the maximum and minimum temperatures. [ A = frac{95 - 70}{2} = frac{25}{2} = 12.5 ]2. Vertical Shift ( B ): The vertical shift ( B ) is the average of the maximum and minimum temperatures. [ B = frac{95 + 70}{2} = frac{165}{2} = 82.5 ]3. Angular Frequency ( omega ): The period of the temperature cycle is 30 days. The angular frequency ( omega ) is given by: [ omega = frac{2pi}{text{Period}} = frac{2pi}{30} = frac{pi}{15} ]4. Phase Shift ( phi ): Since the exact phase shift ( phi ) is not specified in the problem, we'll assume that the sinusoidal function starts from the average temperature and increases (which corresponds to a sine function starting at the average value and moving upwards). If we assume the maximum temperature occurs at ( t = 0 ), then: [ phi = frac{pi}{2} ]Therefore, the temperature function is:[ T(t) = 12.5 sinleft(frac{pi}{15} t + frac{pi}{2}right) + 82.5 ]# Maximum Rate of Temperature Change:The rate of temperature change is given by the derivative of ( T(t) ):[ frac{dT(t)}{dt} = 12.5 cdot frac{pi}{15} cosleft(frac{pi}{15} t + frac{pi}{2}right) ]The maximum rate of change occurs when the cosine function is at its maximum value, which is 1:[max left( frac{dT(t)}{dt} right) = 12.5 cdot frac{pi}{15} cdot 1 = frac{12.5 pi}{15} = frac{5 pi}{6} approx 2.618 text{ °F/day}] 2. Precipitation Pattern AnalysisThe cumulative precipitation ( P(t) ) over ( t ) days is given by:[ P(t) = int_0^t frac{C}{sqrt{2pi sigma^2}} e^{-frac{(x - mu)^2}{2sigma^2}} , dx ]Given:- The total precipitation for the month (30 days) is 5 inches.- The peak precipitation occurs at day 15.- The standard deviation of the daily precipitation is 5 days.1. Finding ( mu ): Since the peak precipitation occurs at day 15, the mean ( mu ) is: [ mu = 15 ]2. Finding ( C ): The total precipitation for 30 days is 5 inches. The integral of the Gaussian function from 0 to 30 days should equal 5 inches: [ int_0^{30} frac{C}{sqrt{2pi sigma^2}} e^{-frac{(x - mu)^2}{2sigma^2}} , dx = 5 ] The integral of a Gaussian function over its entire range (which is effectively from (-infty) to (infty)) equals 1: [ int_{-infty}^{infty} frac{1}{sqrt{2pi sigma^2}} e^{-frac{(x - mu)^2}{2sigma^2}} , dx = 1 ] Since the total precipitation for 30 days is 5 inches: [ C cdot 1 = 5 implies C = 5 ]# Day with the Highest Daily Precipitation:The daily precipitation is given by the Gaussian function itself:[ frac{C}{sqrt{2pi sigma^2}} e^{-frac{(t - mu)^2}{2sigma^2}} ]The peak of this Gaussian function occurs at ( t = mu = 15 ).Final Answer: The final answer is ( A = 12.5 ), ( omega = frac{pi}{15} ), ( phi = frac{pi}{2} ), ( B = 82.5 ), maximum rate of temperature change is (frac{5pi}{6} approx 2.618 text{ °F/day} ), ( C = 5 ), ( mu = 15 ), and the day with the highest daily precipitation is day 15. I hope it is correct.
question:As a budget-conscious library assistant, you are tasked with purchasing office supplies while minimizing costs. You have found two office supply stores, Store A and Store B, both offering different discount schemes.1. Store A offers a 20% discount on all purchases, and if the total purchase exceeds 500, an additional 10% off is applied to the already discounted price. Store B, on the other hand, provides a 25% discount on purchases, but if the total original price exceeds 600, a flat 100 is deducted from the original price, and then the 25% discount is applied. If you plan to buy 650 worth of supplies, determine which store offers the better deal and calculate the final price at each store.2. Additionally, you have a budget constraint that requires you to spend no more than 480. If the supplies cost exactly 650, formulate an inequality to determine the maximum percentage discount (x%) Store C could offer on purchases above 600, and solve for x, given that Store C applies this discount directly to the original price with no additional deductions.
answer:Let's solve the problem step-by-step. Part 1: Comparing Store A and Store BStore A:1. Original Price = 6502. Apply 20% discount: [ text{Discounted Price} = 650 times (1 - 0.20) = 650 times 0.80 = 520 ]3. Since 520 exceeds 500, apply an additional 10% discount: [ text{Final Price} = 520 times (1 - 0.10) = 520 times 0.90 = 468 ]Store B:1. Original Price = 6502. Since 650 exceeds 600, apply a flat 100 deduction: [ text{Price after Deduction} = 650 - 100 = 550 ]3. Apply 25% discount: [ text{Final Price} = 550 times (1 - 0.25) = 550 times 0.75 = 412.5 ]Comparison:- Store A's final price is 468.- Store B's final price is 412.5.Store B offers the better deal. Part 2: Formulating and Solving the Inequality for Store CYou want to determine the maximum percentage discount ( x% ) that Store C could offer.1. Original Price = 6502. Apply ( x% ) discount: [ text{Final Price} = 650 times (1 - frac{x}{100}) ]3. This final price must be no more than 480: [ 650 times (1 - frac{x}{100}) leq 480 ]4. Solve for ( x ): [ 1 - frac{x}{100} leq frac{480}{650} ] [ 1 - frac{x}{100} leq frac{48}{65} ] [ frac{x}{100} geq 1 - frac{48}{65} ] [ frac{x}{100} geq frac{65 - 48}{65} ] [ frac{x}{100} geq frac{17}{65} ] [ x geq frac{17}{65} times 100 ] [ x geq 26.15 ]The maximum percentage discount ( x ) that Store C could offer is approximately ( 26.15% ).Final Answer:The final price at Store A is 468, and the final price at Store B is 412.5. Store B offers the better deal. The maximum percentage discount Store C could offer is ( 26.15%). I hope it is correct.
question:An aerospace engineer is designing a spacecraft guidance system that relies on advanced processors to perform real-time trajectory calculations. The spacecraft must travel from Earth to Mars using a Hohmann transfer orbit, and the guidance system must continuously adjust the spacecraft's path to account for perturbations caused by gravitational influences from other celestial bodies.1. The initial velocity ( v_0 ) required for the spacecraft to enter the transfer orbit is given by:[ v_0 = sqrt{frac{2GM_{odot}}{R_E} - frac{GM_{odot}}{a}} ]where ( G ) is the gravitational constant, ( M_{odot} ) is the mass of the sun, ( R_E ) is the radius of Earth's orbit around the sun, and ( a ) is the semi-major axis of the transfer orbit. Given that ( R_E = 1.496 times 10^8 ) km, ( M_{odot} = 1.989 times 10^{30} ) kg, and ( a = frac{R_E + R_M}{2} ) with ( R_M = 2.279 times 10^8 ) km being the radius of Mars' orbit around the sun, calculate the initial velocity ( v_0 ).2. During the transfer, the onboard processors need to compute corrective maneuvers to keep the spacecraft on course. Assume the perturbing gravitational force ( F_p ) from an asteroid is modeled as:[ F_p = frac{G M_a m}{d^2} cos(theta) ]where ( M_a ) is the mass of the asteroid, ( m ) is the mass of the spacecraft, ( d ) is the distance between the spacecraft and the asteroid, and ( theta ) is the angle between the direction of the force and the spacecraft's velocity vector. If ( M_a = 9.5 times 10^{15} ) kg, ( m = 1 times 10^4 ) kg, ( d = 3.5 times 10^6 ) km, and ( theta = 30^circ ), compute the magnitude of the perturbing gravitational force ( F_p ).
answer:Let's solve each part of the problem step-by-step. Part 1: Calculate the Initial Velocity ( v_0 )Given:- Gravitational constant ( G = 6.67430 times 10^{-11} ) m(^3)kg(^{-1})s(^{-2})- Mass of the sun ( M_{odot} = 1.989 times 10^{30} ) kg- Radius of Earth's orbit ( R_E = 1.496 times 10^8 ) km ( = 1.496 times 10^{11} ) m- Radius of Mars' orbit ( R_M = 2.279 times 10^8 ) km ( = 2.279 times 10^{11} ) mThe semi-major axis ( a ) of the transfer orbit is:[ a = frac{R_E + R_M}{2} ][ a = frac{1.496 times 10^{11} , text{m} + 2.279 times 10^{11} , text{m}}{2} ][ a = frac{3.775 times 10^{11} , text{m}}{2} ][ a = 1.8875 times 10^{11} , text{m} ]The initial velocity ( v_0 ) is given by:[ v_0 = sqrt{frac{2GM_{odot}}{R_E} - frac{GM_{odot}}{a}} ]Now, plug in the values:[ v_0 = sqrt{frac{2 times 6.67430 times 10^{-11} times 1.989 times 10^{30}}{1.496 times 10^{11}} - frac{6.67430 times 10^{-11} times 1.989 times 10^{30}}{1.8875 times 10^{11}}} ]Simplify the calculations step-by-step:First term:[ frac{2 times 6.67430 times 10^{-11} times 1.989 times 10^{30}}{1.496 times 10^{11}} = frac{2 times 1.327124 times 10^{20}}{1.496 times 10^{11}} ][ = frac{2.654248 times 10^{20}}{1.496 times 10^{11}} ][ approx 1.774 times 10^9 , text{m}^2/text{s}^2 ]Second term:[ frac{6.67430 times 10^{-11} times 1.989 times 10^{30}}{1.8875 times 10^{11}} = frac{1.327124 times 10^{20}}{1.8875 times 10^{11}} ][ approx 7.031 times 10^8 , text{m}^2/text{s}^2 ]Now, subtract the second term from the first term:[ 1.774 times 10^9 - 7.031 times 10^8 = 1.0709 times 10^9 , text{m}^2/text{s}^2 ]Finally, take the square root to find ( v_0 ):[ v_0 = sqrt{1.0709 times 10^9} ][ v_0 approx 3.272 times 10^4 , text{m}/text{s} ] Part 2: Compute the Perturbing Gravitational Force ( F_p )Given:- Gravitational constant ( G = 6.67430 times 10^{-11} ) m(^3)kg(^{-1})s(^{-2})- Mass of the asteroid ( M_a = 9.5 times 10^{15} ) kg- Mass of the spacecraft ( m = 1 times 10^4 ) kg- Distance ( d = 3.5 times 10^6 ) km ( = 3.5 times 10^9 ) m- Angle ( theta = 30^circ )The perturbing gravitational force ( F_p ) is given by:[ F_p = frac{G M_a m}{d^2} cos(theta) ]First, calculate ( cos(30^circ) ):[ cos(30^circ) = frac{sqrt{3}}{2} approx 0.866 ]Next, plug in the values:[ F_p = frac{6.67430 times 10^{-11} times 9.5 times 10^{15} times 1 times 10^4}{(3.5 times 10^9)^2} times 0.866 ]Simplify step-by-step:Square the distance:[ (3.5 times 10^9)^2 = 12.25 times 10^{18} ]Calculate the numerator:[ 6.67430 times 10^{-11} times 9.5 times 10^{15} times 1 times 10^4 = 6.340785 times 10^9 ]Now, divide by the squared distance:[ frac{6.340785 times 10^9}{12.25 times 10^{18}} = 5.1757 times 10^{-10} ]Finally, multiply by ( cos(30^circ) ):[ F_p = 5.1757 times 10^{-10} times 0.866 approx 4.485 times 10^{-10} , text{N} ]Final Answer: The final answer is ( v_0 approx 3.272 times 10^4 , text{m}/text{s} ) and ( F_p approx 4.485 times 10^{-10} , text{N} ). I hope it is correct.
question:As the head of content strategy at a streaming service, you are tasked with deciding which films make it onto the platform. You have a dataset of films where each film ( F_i ) has the following attributes:- ( r_i ): Average review score (on a scale of 1 to 10)- ( v_i ): Number of reviews- ( t_i ): Total minutes watched last month- ( c_i ): Cost to acquire the film (in thousands of dollars)- ( g_i ): Number of genres the film belongs toYou aim to maximize the overall user engagement ( E ) defined by:[ E = sum_{i=1}^{n} left( alpha r_i v_i + beta t_i right) - gamma sum_{i=1}^{n} c_i ]where ( alpha ), ( beta ), and ( gamma ) are positive constants that weigh the importance of review scores, watch time, and cost respectively.1. Given a budget constraint ( B ) (in thousands of dollars), formulate the optimization problem to select a subset of films that maximizes ( E ) while ensuring the total acquisition cost does not exceed ( B ).2. Assume further that films belonging to more genres are more likely to attract diverse audiences. Modify the optimization problem to include a term that rewards selecting films with more genres, and describe how this changes the objective function.
answer:Let's solve the given optimization problem step-by-step. Step 1: Original Optimization Problem FormulationGiven:- ( r_i ): Average review score of film ( F_i )- ( v_i ): Number of reviews for film ( F_i )- ( t_i ): Total minutes watched last month for film ( F_i )- ( c_i ): Cost to acquire film ( F_i ) (in thousands of dollars)- ( n ): Number of films- ( B ): Total budget (in thousands of dollars)- ( alpha, beta, gamma ): Positive constantsObjective: Maximize overall user engagement ( E ) defined by:[ E = sum_{i=1}^{n} left( alpha r_i v_i + beta t_i right) - gamma sum_{i=1}^{n} c_i ]Subject to the budget constraint:[ sum_{i=1}^{n} c_i leq B ]Let ( x_i ) be a binary variable where ( x_i = 1 ) if film ( F_i ) is selected, and ( x_i = 0 ) otherwise.The objective function to maximize can be written as:[ E = sum_{i=1}^{n} x_i left( alpha r_i v_i + beta t_i right) - gamma sum_{i=1}^{n} x_i c_i ]Given the budget constraint:[ sum_{i=1}^{n} x_i c_i leq B ] Final Formulation of Original Problem:[ max sum_{i=1}^{n} x_i left( alpha r_i v_i + beta t_i - gamma c_i right) ]subject to:[ sum_{i=1}^{n} x_i c_i leq B ][ x_i in {0, 1}, quad i = 1, 2, ldots, n ] Step 2: Include Genre TermGiven:- ( g_i ): Number of genres the film ( F_i ) belongs toTo incorporate the term that rewards selecting films with more genres, let's introduce a new positive constant ( delta ) that weighs the importance of the number of genres.The modified user engagement ( E' ) can be defined as:[ E' = sum_{i=1}^{n} left( alpha r_i v_i + beta t_i + delta g_i right) - gamma sum_{i=1}^{n} c_i ] Final Formulation of Modified Problem:[ max sum_{i=1}^{n} x_i left( alpha r_i v_i + beta t_i + delta g_i - gamma c_i right) ]subject to:[ sum_{i=1}^{n} x_i c_i leq B ][ x_i in {0, 1}, quad i = 1, 2, ldots, n ]The final answer for the modified optimization problem is:[ max sum_{i=1}^{n} x_i left( alpha r_i v_i + beta t_i + delta g_i - gamma c_i right) ]subject to:[ sum_{i=1}^{n} x_i c_i leq B ][ x_i in {0, 1}, quad i = 1, 2, ldots, n ]Final Answer: The final answer is:[ max sum_{i=1}^{n} x_i left( alpha r_i v_i + beta t_i + delta g_i - gamma c_i right) ]subject to:[ sum_{i=1}^{n} x_i c_i leq B ][ x_i in {0, 1}, quad i = 1, 2, ldots, n ]I hope it is correct.