question:QUESTION: Test for natural language inference.Premise: "Old man selling potatoes in a field next to a body of water."Hypothesis: "Old man selling potatoes in a magnetic field."Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?Options:- yes- no- it is not possible to tellLet's solve it slowly: A field next to a body of water cannot be a magnetic field.The answer is no.QUESTION: Premise: "A group of men walk and hang onto ropes."Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "One man and one woman play tug of war with a rope." is true?Options:- yes- it is not possible to tell- noLet's solve it slowly: Subject could be group of men or one man and one woman.The answer is no.QUESTION: Premise: "A young bull is grabbed by the horns by a man wearing a white cowboy hat in a rodeo ring while other men in white hats watch."Hypothesis: "The bull is being used for a rodeo contest."Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?Let's solve it slowly:

question:You're given a sentence and your task is to classify whether the sentence is acceptable or not. Any sentence which is grammatically correct, has a naturalistic text, is written by a native speaker and which minimizes superfluous content is acceptable, otherwise unacceptable. If the sentence is acceptable then write "acceptable", otherwise "unacceptable".John, because he's such a nice guy, would like that.

question:Title: yep, it's junk Product review: The previous reviewer had it right, the new stuff is made in China and it's pretty cheesy. I needed extra pieces for the set I purchased some time ago. My original set was the heavy guage higher quality stuff made in Korea. This stuff isn't worth the postage: it's smaller, flimsier and doesn't even match the pattern. Fuggedaboudit... Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?unflatteringTitle: Awful, Awful, just absolutely Awful. Did I mention Awful? Product review: Oh my GOD! These are just the worst speakers with the worst sound I have ever heard. But, when you pay 27.00, you get 27.00 worth of sound I guess......... Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?unflatteringQ: Title: A much improved Strongs Concordance Product review: The comfort print feature of this concordance makes it a much easier to use tool - far less eyestrain when doing extensive concordance work. Of course the interreferencing of many other tomes of material with Strong numbers is invaluable too. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?A: flatteringQuestion: Title: My Two Cents Product review: Hmmm I burned a good 500 calories (doing workout one and two) this will be keeper for me. If you can do Jillian Michaels you can do this it is similar but not exactly the same. If your the type of person that needs to have a super fun workout and lose motivation doing repetive moves then go to something like zumba, this workout is not the place. This is a workout for people who want to sweat, have genuine workout and does not care about the extra stuff and motivated by plan old working out, not by the music, the trainer, and different types of exercise moves. The music is not great, the trainer is kind of annoying and doesn't focus on the audience, your jumping most of both workouts and but its a really good cardio WORKOUT. You will sweat, burn calories with basic interval training moves. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?Answer: flattering*Question*Title: Would not consider this "medium" Product review: I received the bag very quickly, and it is a nice looking bag. However, my female cat is regular size if not on the petite side. She was smooshed in this bag and I felt so bad for her I had to return it. I ended up getting the "medium" sized regular Sherpa bag for a little less than this, and she has so much more room and is very happy.So I would consider this bag "small" not "medium".. and the same company that sells this bag sells the Medium sherpa bag for the same price and is much better in my opinion. I will sacrifice the convenience of the backpack for my cats comfort. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?Answerunflattering*Question*Title: Not doing so well... Product review: When I got mine, it was very carefully packaged. It was cute! I've had it for several months and it hasn't improved. It hasn't grown, no blooms. I still think it's cute, but I'm a bit sad there aren't any 'goldfishes'. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?Answer

question:Q: In this task, you are given two simple actions (associated with "A", "B"). You must identify which action is considered less ethical. Do not generate anything else apart from one of the following characters: 'A', 'B'.(A) cutting off my father before the birth of his first grandchild(B) ignoring my grandmaA:

question:TASK DEFINITION: Read the passage and find if the passage agrees, disagrees, or has a neutral stance on whether Global warming is caused by human activities. Answer only with keyword (a) agrees - if passage agrees with the target (b) disagrees - if passage disagrees with the target (c) neutral - if the given passage neither agrees nor disagrees with the target. You don't need to use external knowledge in this task, and you have to answer based on the given passage.PROBLEM: Human activities are not a major cause of global warming.SOLUTION: disagreesPROBLEM: The Arctic environment is changing extremely rapidly and it is time for the rest of the world to take notice and also to take action to address the root causes of climate change.SOLUTION: agreesPROBLEM: Stable sea levels can be rendered to look like they are nonetheless rising at an accelerated pace.SOLUTION:

question:The input contains a debate topic, an argument on the topic and a keypoint, separated by "<sep>". Your task is to answer if the keypoint matches the argument and summarizes exactly what the argument means, in the context of the given topic.Ex Input:Topic: We should legalize sex selection<sep>Argument: Sex selection can lead to a serious gender imbalance<sep>Keypoint: Sex selection can lead to gender imbalanceEx Output:TrueEx Input:Topic: We should close Guantanamo Bay detention camp<sep>Argument: Closing gitmo will only lead to more terrorists running free and thus jeopardizing our safety.<sep>Keypoint: The guantanamo bay detention camp is better for prisoners than the alternativesEx Output:FalseEx Input:Topic: We should prohibit women in combat<sep>Argument: It is scientifically proven that women are as capable as men in combat operations, so discrimination of women is not explained.<sep>Keypoint: Women are an asset in combatEx Output: