question:In this task, you are given a review of movie. Your task is to classify given movie review into two categories: 1) positive, and 2) negative based on its content.[Q]: When I rented this movie, I had very low expectations......but when I saw it, I realized that the movie was less (a lot less) than what I expected. The actors were bad (the doctor's wife was one of the worst), the story was so stupid...it could work for a Disney movie (except for the murders), but this one is not a comedy, it is a laughable masterpiece of stupidity. The title is well chosen except for one thing: they could add stupid movie after Dead Husbands! I give it 0 and a half out of 5.[A]: negative[Q]: Jonathan Rivers (Michael Keaton) suddenly becomes a widower when his wife dies. Soon after, he's approached by a Dr. Price, an expert in Electronic Voice Phenomena (EVP), who claims he's been receiving messages from Jonathan's departed wife Anna via sundry electronic gadgets. Is Anna trying to tell Jonathan something? Is this merely a hint of something on a larger cosmic or otherworldly scale? It's good to see Keaton in a leading role, but the story he's stuck with is convoluted and absurd at points; it's as if the movie doesn't know how to answer any of the questions it brings up, so it just distracts the viewer with new, unrelated questions.Keaton himself is pretty good, convincingly cast as the bereaving widower desperately trying to communicate with his late wife. He's matured quite a bit as an actor, leaving behind the frat-friendly waacky-hijinks roles he played 15 or so years earlier. He looks a little craggy, with a perhaps few more wrinkles than one might expect, but he's lost none of the guile and panache that he's shown during his quarter century in Hollywood.So it's not that Keaton turns in a mediocre performance, it's that the script itself is subpar. Written by Niall Johnson, the plot gets more confusing as it progresses, each tortuous path ending in another tortuous path. This is all well and good if the path leads to some sort of acceptable denouement, something that ties more or less everything together and explains... something. But not White Noise; I knew less about what had happened to Jonathan than I did before I'd first seen him.Keaton's really the only reason to watch this junk, although he gets fine support from Ian McNeice (as Dr. Price) and Deborah Kara Unger as the requisite love interest.[A]: negative[Q]: How can you gather this respectable cast of young British actors and come up with such a pile of filmic manure? Horrible script, annoyingly hectic camera, awfully edited, gruesomely badly acted. Only Rhys Ifans tries to fill his role with life. Another painful proof that "different" sometimes equals "dreck". Why do the money people fail to read the scripts beforehand? Do yourself a favour: spare yourself and do something else - like hitting a mallet onto your knees. It's less painful and more fun than this movie![A]:

question:A thin layer of water is not necessarily left by a recent rainstorm. A thin layer of water does not have to be a puddle.. So what could be the question?Question followed by answer: Premise: "Trees are reflected by a thin layer of water on the cement."Hypothesis: "A recent rainstorm left water puddles that show the tree's reflection."Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?Options:- yes- it is not possible to tell- noit is not possible to tellThere are some people hiking up a mountain in the snow.. So what could be the question?Question followed by answer: If "People are hiking up a mountain in the snow." does that mean that "People hiking in the snow."?Options:- yes- it is not possible to tell- noyesSweeping is a form of cleaning. If the person is not cleaning he would not be taking care of a pile of trash.. So what could be the question?Question followed by answer: If "A public worker is sweeping up a massive pile of trash in front of a monument at a city square." does that mean that "The person is not cleaning."?Options:- yes- it is not possible to tell- nonoContradictory mention of buying wine as against tasting and purchasing olives in sentence 1.. So what could be the question?Question followed by answer:

question:Given the rationale, provide a reasonable question and answer. Step-by-step reasoning process: A rope cannot do anything on its own. The question and answer:

question:In this task, you're given four sentences of a story written in natural language in which one part is missing. Your job is to predict the position and missing part of the story and return in the following format: position, missing part. The missing part is a sentence that completes the story, and the position is the number of the missing sentence in the new story.Q: Sentence1: Faking a brave face, the went forth into the darkened house. Sentence2: He managed to make it all way through without screaming out loud. Sentence3: At the very end, they fell through a trick floor into a bunch of goo. Sentence4: Harry wished he wouldn't have went.A: 1, Harry secretly hated haunted houses, but couldn't let his friend down.Q: Sentence1: One year, Matt was training for a half marathon. Sentence2: Near the time of the race, he slipped on a run and damaged his knee. Sentence3: Matt missed the race and required an extensive rehab. Sentence4: As soon as he could, Matt was back to training.A: 5, His training paid off at a marathon later that year.Q: Sentence1: The school roof buckled under the weight. Sentence2: A janitor climbed on top to inspect. Sentence3: The roof shook under the new weight. Sentence4: The janitor was frightened.A:

question:Instructions: You are given a review about a place. You need to provide a rating from "1 star" to "5 stars" for this place.Input: This place is new! We came to support the new restaurant bar and had a coupon with all their specials. Great price for X-Large Pizza with 2 toppings for 11.99. Plus during happy hour they have 1.50 Coors Light. Great place to watch football they have quite a few TV's so every seat has a great view. One nice feature is their patio bar area, it opens up the place. We came for the pizza and it was very good, thin crust and lots of cheese. The menu looked good and next time we will try their wings. Anyhow, all in all the service was excellent and good pizza!Output:

question:In this task, you will be presented with the directions of a recipe separated by "," and have to fill in the "___" which is a step that is missing from the recipe.One example: Preheat oven to 325F and grease and flour a 10" tube pan.,Soak the nutmeg in the whiskey for ten minutes.,______,Cream butter and sugar together until fluffy.,Add eggs, one at a time until well incorporated.,Fold in remaining 1 1/4 cups flour, cream of tartar, baking soda, salt, soaked nutmeg and pecan/raisin mixture until well combined.,Spoon into prepared pan.,Bake for 1 hour and 15 minutes or until cake pulls away slightly from the edge of the pan.,Let stand in the pan for 30 minutes, then turn out onto cooling rack for complete cooling.,Store in an airtight container.Solution is here: Stir together pecans, raisins, and 1/4 cup flour; set aside.Explanation: This is a good example, as we see the missing step is generated correctly from the available directions.Now, solve this: mix all the lima bean stuff,in a casserole,______,bake 2 hours 350,check it does not dry out.Solution: