question:OK. You'll be given the following question. Please do chain-of-thought reasoning.Which of the following sentences is nonsensical?Options:- Sentence A: "We use the mouse to enter text."- Sentence B: "We use the keyboard to enter text."

question:People are taking advantage of a new sale at the market.The question and answer are below.Premise: "At a supermarket."Hypothesis: "People are buying their groceries."Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?Options:- yes- it is not possible to tell- noit is not possible to tellThe water feature does not need to be a large water fountain.The question and answer are below.Test for natural language inference.Premise: "Young woman in a city park near a water feature."Hypothesis: "A woman is standing next to a large water fountain."Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?Options:- yes- no- it is not possible to tellit is not possible to tellWorkers going over paperwork implies that they are doing so inside.. So what could be the question?Question followed by answer: Premise: "Two workers wearing orange vests going over paperwork."Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "Two people are inside." is true?Options:- yes- it is not possible to tell- noyesYou don't always have to clean your glasses when you remove them.The question and answer are below.Given the sentence "A boy takes off his glasses while playing with his toy trains." is it true that "A boy removes his glasses to clean them."?it is not possible to tellGirls laughing while sitting on wooden steps must be laughing on the steps.The question and answer are below.Test for natural language inference.Premise: "Two girls in shorts and t-shirts are laughing while sitting on wooden steps."Hypothesis: "Two girls are laughing on the steps."Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?Options:- yes- no- it is not possible to tellyesIf a girl is going into some sort of body of water then she is certainly near that water as well.The question and answer are below.

question:You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.Given a sentence, generate what should be the most likely next statement. The next statement should be reasonable and logically correct.We notice a man in a kayak and a yellow helmet coming in from the left. As he approaches, his kayak Solution: flips upside - downWhy? Flipping of the kayak is a probable event. It is a logical next statement, given the context.New input: Benches line the space, facing a performance screen. SomeoneSolution:

question:You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.In this task, you're given the title and three arbitrary sentences out of a five-sentence story. You are also given three additional sentence options, a, b, and c, that may or may not belong to the story. Your job is to pick the two options that seamlessly connect with the rest of the story; note that the selected choices may fit into the story at any point. Indicate your selected choices in order, i.e., as 'ab'/'bc'/'ac' and not as 'ba'/'ca'/'cb'. If options are equally plausible, pick the ones that make more sense.Title: Marcus Buys Khakis. Marcus needed clothing for a business casual event. He decided to buy a pair of khakis. The pair he bought fit him perfectly. Choices: a. Marcus was happy to have the right clothes for the event. b. He left in a huff for having his ideas mocked. c. All of his clothes were either too formal or too casual.Solution: acWhy? Marcus is buying clothes for a business event and not presenting an idea.New input: Title: Tom's bike was stolen recently. One day he found it at a pawn shop. It had special markings he made on the frame. Choices: a. He filed a police report but they didn't give him much hope. b. Tom was able to prove it was his and get it back. c. She later revealed she got back with her boyfriend.Solution:

question:Premise: "A child in a white shirt and hat is climbing."Hypothesis: "A little kid wearing white climbs."Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?Let's solve step-by-step:

question:In this task, you are given a review of a product in the Polish language. Your task is to classify the given product review into these three categories: 1) positive, 2)neutral, 3) negative based on its content.Example input: Text: Biję się z myślami czy oby 2 gwiazdki to nie za dużo. Menu wyświetlacza wygląda jak "dzieło" niezbyt uzdolnionego nastolatka i po prostu jest toporne. Klapka nie budzi zaufania, nie dość że ciężko chodzi to jeszcze podejrzanie rusza się na boki, a to dopiero początek. Ogólnie telefon łączy ze sobą brak zalet smarfona (wielkość) i tradycyjnych telefonów komórkowych (funkcjonalność). Rzeczywiście wygląda jakby był zaprojektowany na kolanie i bez jakiejkolwiek wiedzy co Nokia potrafiła włożyć do swoich flagowych modeli komórek tradycyjnych. Bateria owszem trzyma długo, ale brak wielu aplikacji wyjaśnia z łatwością ten wątpliwy fenomen. Pomijam fakt, że w rozumieniu Noki banany są w odcieniu cytrynowym, więc chyba nie najdojrzalszy to produkt.Question: What is the rating for the text?Example output: neutralExample explanation: The review has a neutral sentiment. Hence, it can be classified as "neutral".Q: Text: Mimo że telefon dodatkowo był w przeciwwstrząsowym futerale, przy pierwszym upadku na drewnianą podłogę z wysokości zaledwie pół metra szkło się pokruszyło. co stawia pod znakiem zapytania jego przydatność. Takie upadki nie stanowią zagrożenia dla ekranu telefonu, z kolei przy uderzeniach groźnych dla ekranu, szkło ochronne może nie zaabsorbować wystarczającej ilości energii, by ekran ochronić. Oczywiście mogę się mylić, ale sprawdzać tego nie będę.Question: What is the rating for the text?A: