question:QUESTION: Was Florence a Theocracy during Italian Renaissance?Please give rationale first, then the answer.ANSWER: The Italian Renaissance was a period of history from the 13th century to 1600. A theocracy is a type of rule in which religious leaders have power. Friar Girolamo Savonarola was the ruler of Florence, after driving out the Medici family, from November 1494 – 23 May 1498.. The answer is: yes.Question: Were there eight humans on Noah's Ark?Answer: Noah only took his family aboard the Ark. Noah brought his wife, three sons, and his sons' wives. Four couples lived on the Ark, eight total people.. The answer is: yes.Did children read Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone during the Albanian Civil War?Rationale first then the answer.Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone was a 1997 children's fantasy book. The Albanian Civil War, also called the Albanian Civil Unrest, happened in 1997.. The answer is: yes.QUESTION: Did anyone in the 1912 election take a majority of the popular vote?Please give rationale first, then the answer.ANSWER: Woodrow Wilson took 41% of the vote. Theodore Roosevelt took 27% of the vote. William Howard Taft took 23% of the vote. Eugene Debs took 6% of the vote. A majority is more than 50%.. The answer is: no.Question: Does 2015 have more unlucky Friday's than usual?Answer: Friday the 13th is known as an unlucky Friday because of the number 13. A year can have as many as three Friday the 13ths. One Friday the 13th is the average per year. There were 3 Friday the 13ths in 2015.. The answer is: yes.Do some religions look forward to armageddon?Rationale first then the answer.

question:Given the sentence "A woman in a white tank top and jean shorts walks down a sandy sidewalk." is it true that "A woman walks down a sidewalk."? Let's be accurate as possible and think first.

question:Part 1. DefinitionWe would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control) into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.Part 2. ExampleSent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .Answer: Not similarExplanation: The first argument supports gun control by saying possessing guns make people likely to kill, the second disapproves it by saying men need guns.Part 3. ExerciseSent1: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns. Sent2: there are too many gun deaths and while there will never be a ban in America i find it appalling that so many fight to prevent gun restrictions and background checks.Answer:

question:Given a sentence in Spanish, generate a new Spanish sentence by performing small changes on the sentence. Here, make sure that the changes are semantically related and syntactically similar to the input. And the generated sentence should have high commonsense plausibility, that is to have reasonable probability of it being true.[EX Q]: Los maestros pueden leer a los estudiantes.[EX A]: Los libros pueden leer a las audiencias.[EX Q]: El tronco de un ganso puede ser tortuga del sur.[EX A]: La profundidad de un polo puede mirar hacia el sur.[EX Q]: Cuando se detona, un arma nuclear produce una nube de hongos.[EX A]:

question:Premise: "Three ice hockey players in black play outside."Based on this premise, can we conclude that the hypothesis "A couple of basketball players eat at the cafeteria." is true?Options:- yes- it is not possible to tell- no Stream of thoughts:

question:Q: "With all the new reports coming out on UFOs, Johnson Space Center has been denied all reports they are hiding a crashed alien space craft."Is the above claim true?Options:- yes- noA: noExplain how we arrive at this answer: