Skip to content
🤔 AI effective tips collection 🧠
question:The number of intersection points between the parabola y=3x^{2}+2x+1 and the x-axis is ______.

answer:To determine the number of intersection points between the parabola (y = 3x^2 + 2x + 1) and the (x)-axis, we need to solve for the values of (x) where (y = 0). This involves solving the quadratic equation (3x^2 + 2x + 1 = 0). The number of real solutions to this quadratic equation will give us the number of intersection points.Let's break this down step-by-step:1. Set up the quadratic equation: (3x^2 + 2x + 1 = 0)2. Calculate the discriminant: The discriminant of a quadratic equation (ax^2 + bx + c = 0) is given by (D = b^2 - 4ac). The discriminant will tell us how many real solutions the equation has: - If (D > 0), there are two distinct real solutions. - If (D = 0), there is exactly one real solution. - If (D < 0), there are no real solutions.Let's implement this in Python using sympy to find the discriminant and determine the number of intersection points.```pythonimport sympy as sp# Define the variablex = sp.symbols('x')# Define the quadratic equationquadratic_eq = 3*x2 + 2*x + 1# Calculate the discriminanta = 3b = 2c = 1discriminant = b2 - 4*a*c# Determine the number of real solutions based on the discriminantif discriminant > 0: num_solutions = 2elif discriminant == 0: num_solutions = 1else: num_solutions = 0print(num_solutions)``````output0```The output indicates that the discriminant of the quadratic equation (3x^2 + 2x + 1 = 0) is less than zero. This means there are no real solutions to the equation, and hence, the parabola (y = 3x^2 + 2x + 1) does not intersect the (x)-axis at any point.Therefore, the number of intersection points between the parabola (y = 3x^2 + 2x + 1) and the (x)-axis is (boxed{0}).

question:Suppose z and w are complex numbers such that[|z| = |w| = z overline{w} + overline{z} w= 1.]Find the largest possible value of the real part of z + w.

answer:To solve the problem, we need to maximize the real part of ( z + w ) given the conditions on the complex numbers ( z ) and ( w ). Let's break down the problem into manageable steps:1. Understand the Given Conditions: - (|z| = 1) which means ( z overline{z} = 1 ). - (|w| = 1) which means ( w overline{w} = 1 ). - The given condition ( z overline{w} + overline{z} w = 1 ).2. Express ( z ) and ( w ) in Polar Form: Since (|z| = 1) and (|w| = 1), we can write: [ z = e^{itheta}, quad w = e^{iphi} ] where (theta) and (phi) are real numbers representing the arguments of ( z ) and ( w ), respectively.3. Substitute the Conditions: Substitute ( z = e^{itheta} ) and ( w = e^{iphi} ) into the condition ( z overline{w} + overline{z} w = 1 ): [ e^{itheta} e^{-iphi} + e^{-itheta} e^{iphi} = 1 ] Simplify the expression using Euler's formula: [ e^{i(theta - phi)} + e^{-i(theta - phi)} = 1 ] This implies: [ 2 cos(theta - phi) = 1 quad text{or} quad cos(theta - phi) = frac{1}{2} ]4. Maximize the Real Part of ( z + w ): The real part of ( z + w ) is given by: [ text{Re}(z + w) = text{Re}(e^{itheta} + e^{iphi}) = cos(theta) + cos(phi) ] We need to maximize ( cos(theta) + cos(phi) ) subject to the condition ( cos(theta - phi) = frac{1}{2} ).Let's implement this in Python using sympy to find the maximum real part of ( z + w ).```pythonimport sympy as sp# Define the variablestheta, phi = sp.symbols('theta phi', real=True)# Given condition: cos(theta - phi) = 1/2cos_condition = sp.cos(theta - phi) - 1/2# Real part of z + w: cos(theta) + cos(phi)real_part = sp.cos(theta) + sp.cos(phi)# Substitute phi with (theta - arccos(1/2)) or (theta + arccos(1/2))phi1 = theta - sp.acos(1/2)phi2 = theta + sp.acos(1/2)# Calculate the real part for both casesreal_part_1 = real_part.subs(phi, phi1)real_part_2 = real_part.subs(phi, phi2)# Simplify the expressionsreal_part_1 = sp.simplify(real_part_1)real_part_2 = sp.simplify(real_part_2)# Find the maximum valuemax_real_part = sp.Max(real_part_1, real_part_2)max_real_part = sp.simplify(max_real_part)print(max_real_part)``````outputMax(cos(theta) + cos(theta - 1.0471975511966), cos(theta) + cos(theta + 1.0471975511966))```The output indicates that we need to evaluate two cases for the real part of (z + w):1. ( cos(theta) + cos(theta - frac{pi}{3}) )2. ( cos(theta) + cos(theta + frac{pi}{3}) )Let's simplify these expressions and find the one that gives the maximum value. Simplifying Trigonometric ExpressionsGiven that (cos(theta - frac{pi}{3})) and (cos(theta + frac{pi}{3})) are involved, we can use the cosine addition formulas:[cos(theta pm frac{pi}{3}) = cos(theta)cos(frac{pi}{3}) mp sin(theta)sin(frac{pi}{3})]Since (cos(frac{pi}{3}) = frac{1}{2}) and (sin(frac{pi}{3}) = frac{sqrt{3}}{2}), we have:[cos(theta - frac{pi}{3}) = cos(theta)frac{1}{2} + sin(theta)frac{sqrt{3}}{2}][cos(theta + frac{pi}{3}) = cos(theta)frac{1}{2} - sin(theta)frac{sqrt{3}}{2}]Substituting these back into the expressions:[cos(theta) + cos(theta - frac{pi}{3}) = cos(theta) + cos(theta)frac{1}{2} + sin(theta)frac{sqrt{3}}{2} = frac{3}{2}cos(theta) + frac{sqrt{3}}{2}sin(theta)][cos(theta) + cos(theta + frac{pi}{3}) = cos(theta) + cos(theta)frac{1}{2} - sin(theta)frac{sqrt{3}}{2} = frac{3}{2}cos(theta) - frac{sqrt{3}}{2}sin(theta)]Now we need to find the maximum value of these expressions over all possible values of (theta). Maximizing the Real PartThe maximum value of ( frac{3}{2}cos(theta) + frac{sqrt{3}}{2}sin(theta) ) and ( frac{3}{2}cos(theta) - frac{sqrt{3}}{2}sin(theta) ) can be found by recognizing that they are linear combinations of (cos(theta)) and (sin(theta)).We can use the fact that the maximum value of ( acos(theta) + bsin(theta) ) is given by ( sqrt{a^2 + b^2} ).For both expressions, we will calculate this directly.Let's compute this in Python:```pythonimport sympy as sp# Define the variablestheta = sp.symbols('theta', real=True)# Expressions to maximizeexpr1 = (3/2) * sp.cos(theta) + (sp.sqrt(3)/2) * sp.sin(theta)expr2 = (3/2) * sp.cos(theta) - (sp.sqrt(3)/2) * sp.sin(theta)# Calculate the maximum value of each expressionmax_expr1 = sp.sqrt((3/2)2 + (sp.sqrt(3)/2)2)max_expr2 = sp.sqrt((3/2)2 + (sp.sqrt(3)/2)2)# Since the forms are structurally identical, their maxima will be the samemaximum_value = max(max_expr1, max_expr2)maximum_value = sp.simplify(maximum_value)print(maximum_value)``````output1.73205080756888```The output indicates that the maximum value of the real part of (z + w) is approximately (1.73205080756888).This value is actually (sqrt{3}). Thus, the largest possible value of the real part of (z + w) is:[boxed{sqrt{3}}]

question:For which values of ( n ) is the number ( P_n = 36^n + 24^n - 7^n - 5^n ) divisible by 899?

answer:To determine for which values of ( n ) the number ( P_n = 36^n + 24^n - 7^n - 5^n ) is divisible by 899, we can proceed as follows:1. Understand the Problem: We need to find integers ( n ) such that ( P_n = 36^n + 24^n - 7^n - 5^n equiv 0 pmod{899} ).2. Factorize 899: First, let's factorize 899 to simplify the problem. We have: [ 899 = 29 times 31 ]3. Use Chinese Remainder Theorem: We need to find ( n ) such that: [ 36^n + 24^n - 7^n - 5^n equiv 0 pmod{29} ] and [ 36^n + 24^n - 7^n - 5^n equiv 0 pmod{31} ]4. Solve the Two Congruences: We will solve the two congruences separately and then use the Chinese Remainder Theorem to find ( n ).Let's implement this step-by-step approach in Python using the sympy library.```pythonimport sympy as sp# Define the modulus valuesmod1 = 29mod2 = 31# Define the expression to check divisibility for each modulusdef is_divisible(n): P_n = 36n + 24n - 7n - 5n return (P_n % mod1 == 0) and (P_n % mod2 == 0)# Find the minimum n for which the condition holdsfor n in range(1, 1000): # Arbitrarily chosen upper limit, adjust as needed if is_divisible(n): print(n) break``````outputFile " print( break)SyntaxError: invalid syntax```It looks like there was an error in the code due to the misplaced `print` statement. The `print` statement should be on its own line. Let's correct this and also add some additional code to check a reasonable range of ( n ) values for divisibility.Here's the corrected code:```pythonimport sympy as sp# Define the modulus valuesmod1 = 29mod2 = 31# Define the expression to check divisibility for each modulusdef is_divisible(n): P_n = 36n + 24n - 7n - 5n return (P_n % mod1 == 0) and (P_n % mod2 == 0)# Find the minimum n for which the condition holdsfound_n = Nonefor n in range(1, 1000): # Arbitrarily chosen upper limit, adjust as needed if is_divisible(n): found_n = n breakprint(found_n)``````output2```The output of the code indicates that the smallest ( n ) for which ( P_n = 36^n + 24^n - 7^n - 5^n ) is divisible by 899 is ( boxed{2} ).

question:Jay bought a book for 25, a pen for 4, and a ruler for 1. He paid with a fifty-dollar bill. How much change, in dollars, did Jay get?

answer:To find out the amount of change Jay received, we need to follow these steps:1. Calculate the total cost of the book, pen, and ruler.2. Subtract the total cost from the amount Jay paid with.Let's calculate this using Python.```python# Define the costs of the itemscost_book = 25cost_pen = 4cost_ruler = 1# Calculate the total costtotal_cost = cost_book + cost_pen + cost_ruler# Amount Jay paid withamount_paid = 50# Calculate the changechange = amount_paid - total_costprint(change)``````output20```The total cost of the items is 25 + 4 + 1 = 30. Jay paid with a fifty-dollar bill.The change Jay received is:[50 - 30 = 20]Thus, Jay got (boxed{20}) dollars in change.

question:Luther designs clothes for a high fashion company. His latest line of clothing uses both silk and cashmere fabrics. There are ten pieces made with silk and half that number made with cashmere. If his latest line has thirteen pieces, how many pieces use a blend of cashmere and silk?

answer:First, let’s set up the problem. We know that:1. Luther's latest line has 13 pieces total.2. There are 10 pieces made with silk.3. There are (frac{10}{2} = 5) pieces made with cashmere.Let's denote:- (s): the number of pieces made only with silk,- (c): the number of pieces made only with cashmere,- (b): the number of pieces made with a blend of both silk and cashmere.From the problem, we have:1. (s + b = 10) (total pieces made with silk),2. (c + b = 5) (total pieces made with cashmere),3. (s + c + b = 13) (total pieces).We need to solve these equations to find (b), the number of pieces that use a blend of cashmere and silk. Let's solve it with code לפרשת relevant algebraic equation.```pythonfrom sympy import symbols, Eq, solve# Define the variabless, c, b = symbols('s c b')# Define the equationseq1 = Eq(s + b, 10) # total pieces made with silkeq2 = Eq(c + b, 5) # total pieces made with cashmereeq3 = Eq(s + c + b, 13) # total pieces# Solve the system of equationssolution = solve((eq1, eq2, eq3), (s, c, b))print(solution)``````output{s: 8, c: 3, b: 2}```The solution to the system of equations gives us:[s = 8, quad c = 3, quad b = 2]This means there are 8 pieces made only with silk, 3 pieces made only with cashmere, and (boxed{2}) pieces that use a blend of both silk and cashmere.

question:If the polynomial x^{2}+mx+6 is factored as left(x-2right)left(x+nright), then m=____.

answer:To solve the problem, we need to compare the given polynomial (x^2 + mx + 6) with the factored form ((x-2)(x+n)). 1. Expand the factored form: First, let's expand ((x-2)(x+n)) to match the given polynomial.2. Equate the coefficients: Compare the coefficients of the expanded form with the given polynomial (x^2 + mx + 6) to find the value of (m).Let's break this down step-by-step and use sympy to solve for (m).Here is the implementation in Python:```pythonimport sympy as sp# Define the variablex = sp.symbols('x')# Define the polynomial and its factored formpolynomial = x2 + sp.symbols('m')*x + 6factored_form = (x - 2)*(x + sp.symbols('n'))# Expand the factored formexpanded_form = sp.expand(factored_form)# Print the expanded form to verifyprint(expanded_form)# Coefficients comparisonm, n = sp.symbols('m n')equation_m = sp.Eq(expanded_form.coeff(x), polynomial.coeff(x))equation_n = sp.Eq(expanded_form.coeff(x0), polynomial.coeff(x0))# Solve for m and nsolution = sp.solve((equation_m, equation_n), (m, n))print(solution)``````outputn*x - 2*n + x2 - 2*x[]```From the expanded form ((x-2)(x+n) = x^2 + nx - 2x - 2n), we can see that the equation obtained is:[ x^2 + (n-2)x - 2n ]We need to compare this with the polynomial (x^2 + mx + 6):1. Equate the coefficients of (x) term: The coefficient of (x) in the expanded form is (n-2). This must be equal to the coefficient (m) in the given polynomial.2. Equate the constant term: The constant term in the expanded form is (-2n). This must be equal to the constant term (6) in the given polynomial.Let's solve these equations simultaneously:[m = n - 2][-2n = 6]We'll solve these equations to find (m) and (n).Here is the updated Python implementation:```pythonimport sympy as sp# Define the variablesm, n = sp.symbols('m n')# Define the equationsequation1 = sp.Eq(n - 2, m)equation2 = sp.Eq(-2*n, 6)# Solve the system of equationssolution = sp.solve((equation1, equation2), (m, n))print(solution[m])``````output-5```The solution indicates that the value of (m) is (-5).Thus, if the polynomial (x^2 + mx + 6) is factored as ((x - 2)(x + n)), then the value of (m) is (boxed{-5}).

Released under the MIT License.

has loaded