Skip to content
🤔 AI effective tips collection 🧠
question:How many right triangles have integer leg lengths a and b and a hypotenuse of length b+1, where b<100?mathrm{(A)} 6qquadmathrm{(B)} 7qquadmathrm{(C)} 8qquadmathrm{(D)} 9qquadmathrm{(E)} 10

answer:To solve this problem, we need to find the number of right triangles with integer leg lengths (a) and (b) and a hypotenuse of length (b+1), where (b < 100). Given that it is a right triangle, we can use the Pythagorean theorem:[a^2 + b^2 = (b+1)^2]We can rewrite this equation as:[a^2 + b^2 = b^2 + 2b + 1]By simplifying, we get:[a^2 = 2b + 1]We need to find all integer solutions for (a) and (b) such that (b < 100). Specifically, (a^2) must be an odd integer since it equals (2b + 1).Let's implement this in Python and use SymPy to help solve the problem step-by-step.```pythonimport sympy as sp# Define the variableb = sp.symbols('b', integer=True, positive=True)# Define the equation a^2 = 2b + 1a_squared = 2*b + 1# Initialize the count of solutionscount = 0# Iterate over possible values of bfor b_val in range(1, 100): a_val_squared = a_squared.subs(b, b_val) # Check if a_val_squared is a perfect square if sp.sqrt(a_val_squared).is_integer: count += 1print(count)``````output6```The number of right triangles with integer leg lengths (a) and (b) and a hypotenuse of length (b+1), where (b < 100), is (boxed{6}).

question:The line (frac{x}{4}+frac{y}{3}=1) intersects the ellipse (frac{x^{2}}{16}+frac{y^{2}}{9}=1) at points (A) and (B). Find the number of points (P) on the ellipse such that the area of (triangle APB) is equal to 3:A. 1 pointB. 2 pointsC. 3 pointsD. 4 points

answer:To find the number of points ( P ) on the ellipse (frac{x^{2}}{16}+frac{y^{2}}{9}=1) such that the area of (triangle APB) is equal to 3, we'll follow these steps:1. Find Intersection Points ( A ) and ( B ): Determine the points where the line (frac{x}{4}+frac{y}{3}=1) intersects the ellipse (frac{x^{2}}{16}+frac{y^{2}}{9}=1).2. Parameterize Points on the Ellipse: We parameterize the points (P) on the ellipse using a trigonometric parameterization.3. Calculate the Area of (triangle APB): Find the area of the triangle for all possible points ( P).4. Count Points for Specific Area Condition: Determine how many points ( P ) satisfy the condition that the area of the triangle is equal to 3.Let's start by finding the intersection points ( A ) and ( B ) using code. Finding Intersection PointsThe intersection of a line and an ellipse can be found by solving a system of equations.1. (frac{x}{4}+frac{y}{3}=1)2. (frac{x^{2}}{16}+frac{y^{2}}{9}=1)Let's solve this system of equations.```pythonfrom sympy import symbols, Eq, solve # Define the variables x, y = symbols('x y', real=True) # Define the equations line_eq = Eq(x/4 + y/3, 1) ellipse_eq = Eq(x2/16 + y2/9, 1) # Solve the system of equations intersection_points = solve((line_eq, ellipse_eq), (x, y)) print(intersection_points)``````output[(0, 3), (4, 0)]```The intersection points ( A ) and ( B ) are found to be ( (0, 3) ) and ( (4, 0) ) respectively. Parameterizing Points on the EllipseNext, we parameterize points ( P ) on the ellipse (frac{x^{2}}{16}+frac{y^{2}}{9}=1). The parametric form of the ellipse is:[ x = 4 cos theta ][ y = 3 sin theta ] Area of (triangle APB)The area of a triangle given vertices ((x_1, y_1)), ((x_2, y_2)), and ((x_3, y_3)) can be found using the determinant formula:[ text{Area} = frac{1}{2} left| x_1(y_2 - y_3) + x_2(y_3 - y_1) + x_3(y_1 - y_2) right| ]For our specific points (A(0, 3)), (B(4, 0)), and (P(4 cos theta, 3 sin theta)), we plug-in these coordinates into the area formula and solve the area equation for ( P ) such that the area equals 3.Let's express and solve this in code.```pythonfrom sympy import cos, sin, pi # Define theta theta = symbols('theta', real=True) # Define the coordinates of point P on the ellipse x_P = 4 * cos(theta) y_P = 3 * sin(theta) # Coordinates of points A and B A = (0, 3) B = (4, 0) # Calculate the area using the determinant formula area = 1/2 * abs(A[0]*(B[1] - y_P) + B[0]*(y_P - A[1]) + x_P*(A[1] - B[1])) # We know the area is 3, solve for theta theta_solutions = solve(Eq(area, 3), theta) theta_solutions = [sol.evalf() for sol in theta_solutions] print(theta_solutions)``````output[(0, 3), (4, 0)]```The solutions to the equation indicating the angles ( theta ) where the area of (triangle APB) is 3 are approximately:- (theta_1 approx -0.424)- (theta_2 approx 1.995) Determining Distinct PointsSince the ellipse is symmetric, the points corresponding to (theta) and (theta + 2kpi) (for any integer (k)) are the same point. Therefore, a range of ([0, 2pi)) is sufficient to find unique points on the ellipse.Let's convert these (theta) values into the unique points ( P ) and confirm their distinctness.For ( theta in [-pi , pi) ), the ellipse generates unique points if symmetrically opposite points are not included (they will generate the same points due to periodic nature).We will also verify if these points are distinct in the provided range.```pythonimport numpy as np # Converting theta to unique points within range [0, 2*pi) def unique_points(theta_list): points = [] for theta in theta_list: if theta < 0: theta += 2*pi if theta not in [point[2] for point in points]: points.append((4 * cos(theta), 3 * sin(theta), theta % (2*pi))) return points distinct_points = unique_points(theta_solutions) print(distinct_points)``````output[-0.424031039490741, 1.99482736628564]```The distinct points (P) on the ellipse that result in the triangle ( triangle APB) having an area of 3 are approximately:1. ( (3.646, -1.234) )2. ( (-1.646, 2.734) )These are two distinct points on the ellipse satisfying the given condition.Therefore, the number of points ( P ) on the ellipse such that the area of (triangle APB) equals 3 is:[boxed{2}]

question:Solve the inequalitysqrt{6 x-13}-sqrt{3 x^{2}-13 x+13} geqslant 3 x^{2}-19 x+26In the answer, provide the sum of all integer values of x that satisfy the inequality.

answer:To solve the inequality [sqrt{6 x-13}-sqrt{3 x^{2}-13 x+13} geqslant 3 x^{2}-19 x+26]we can use a computational approach to accurately determine the integer values ( x ) that meet this condition. Here's a step-by-step plan:1. Define a function for both sides of the inequality.2. Determine the domain of ( x ) over which both sides of the inequality are real and well-defined.3. Use numerical methods to find the points ( x ) where the inequality holds.4. Filter the integer values of ( x ) that satisfy the inequality.5. Sum these integer values.First, let's define the relevant functions and determine the domain. The terms inside the square roots must be non-negative.[6x - 13 geq 0 quad Rightarrow quad x geq frac{13}{6}][3x^2 - 13x + 13 geq 0]To solve the quadratic inequality, we need the roots of the equation ( 3x^2 - 13x + 13 = 0 ). We'll calculate these roots using the quadratic formula:[x = frac{-b pm sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}]for ( a = 3, b = -13, ) and ( c = 13 ).Let's start by solving the quadratic inequality to find the domain.```pythonimport sympy as sp# Define variables and quadratic equationx = sp.symbols('x')quadratic_expr = 3*x2 - 13*x + 13# Solve for rootsroots = sp.solve(quadratic_expr, x)print(roots)``````output[13/6 - sqrt(13)/6, sqrt(13)/6 + 13/6]```The roots of the equation ( 3x^2 - 13x + 13 = 0 ) are:[x_1 = frac{13 - sqrt{13}}{6}, quad x_2 = frac{13 + sqrt{13}}{6}]For the quadratic ( 3x^2 - 13x + 13 geq 0 ), we need to examine the intervals determined by these roots. The quadratic is a parabola opening upwards, so it is non-negative outside the interval defined by these roots:[x leq frac{13 - sqrt{13}}{6} quad cup quad x geq frac{13 + sqrt{13}}{6}]Now we'll determine the intersection of this domain with ( x geq frac{13}{6} ). Clearly ( x geq frac{13 + sqrt{13}}{6} ) is the relevant interval. Next, we will evaluate the inequality over this interval numerically, specifically checking integer values to see which satisfy the inequality. We'll set up the inequality and iterate through integer values starting from the nearest integer greater than or equal to ( frac{13 + sqrt{13}}{6} ).```pythonfrom sympy import sqrt # Calculate the numerical value of the boundary boundary = (13 + sqrt(13)) / 6 boundary_value = boundary.evalf() # Define the functions for the inequality lhs = sp.sqrt(6*x - 13) - sp.sqrt(3*x2 - 13*x + 13) rhs = 3*x2 - 19*x + 26 # Initialize the sum of integer values satisfying the inequality sum_of_integers = 0 satisfying_integers = [] # Iterate through integer values starting from the nearest integer greater than or equal to the boundary_value start = int(sp.ceiling(boundary_value)) for i in range(start, 100): # Arbitrarily choose a large upper limit if lhs.subs(x, i) >= rhs.subs(x, i): sum_of_integers += i satisfying_integers.append(i) print((sum_of_integers, satisfying_integers))``````output(7, [3, 4])```The sum of all integer values of ( x ) that satisfy the inequality [sqrt{6 x-13}-sqrt{3 x^{2}-13 x+13} geqslant 3 x^{2}-19 x+26]is (boxed{7}). The integer values that satisfy the inequality are ( x = 3 ) and ( x = 4 ).

question:There is a batch of assignments that Mr. Wang originally planned to grade at a rate of 6 assignments per hour. After grading for 2 hours, he decided to increase his rate to 8 assignments per hour, finishing 3 hours earlier than initially planned. How many assignments are in this batch?

answer:To find the total number of assignments in the batch, let's set up the equations based on the information given in the problem:1. Let ( A ) be the total number of assignments.2. Mr. Wang grades 6 assignments per hour for the first 2 hours.3. After 2 hours, he grades 8 assignments per hour.4. He finishes 3 hours earlier than if he had graded at 6 assignments per hour the whole time.Let's first calculate how many assignments he grades in the first 2 hours:[ text{Assignments in first 2 hours} = 6 , text{assignments/hour} times 2 , text{hours} = 12 , text{assignments} ]Let ( t ) be the total time Mr. Wang would have taken if he graded at the rate of 6 assignments per hour for the entire batch. The number of assignments can then be expressed as:[ A = 6t ]Given that he takes 3 hours less by increasing his rate after 2 hours:[ t' = t - 3 ]He grades the remaining ( A - 12 ) assignments at a rate of 8 assignments per hour after the first 2 hours. The time taken to complete the remaining assignments is given by:[ text{Remaining time} = frac{A - 12}{8} ]Considering he invested 2 hours initially, the total time when switching rates becomes:[ 2 + frac{A - 12}{8} ]Setting this equal to ( t - 3 ):[ 2 + frac{A - 12}{8} = t - 3 ]Since ( A = 6t ):[ 2 + frac{6t - 12}{8} = t - 3 ]Now let's solve for ( t ) and subsequently for ( A ):[ 2 + frac{6t - 12}{8} = t - 3 ]Let's solve this equation using Python.```pythonfrom sympy import symbols, Eq, solve # Define variables t = symbols('t') # Define the equation A = 6 * t remaining_time = (A - 12) / 8 total_time_with_rate_change = 2 + remaining_time # Original planned time t reduced by 3 hours reduced_time = t - 3 # Equate times and solve equation = Eq(total_time_with_rate_change, reduced_time) solution_t = solve(equation, t)[0] # Calculate total assignments total_assignments = 6 * solution_t print(total_assignments)``````output84```The total number of assignments in the batch is (boxed{84}).

question:If the algebraic expressions 4x-1 and 3x-6 are additive inverses of each other, then the value of x is ____.

answer:To find the value of (x) such that the algebraic expressions (4x - 1) and (3x - 6) are additive inverses of each other, we need to solve the equation:[4x - 1 = -(3x - 6)]This equation states that the expression (4x - 1) is equal to the negative of the expression (3x - 6). Let's proceed step-by-step to solve for (x) using Python and the sympy library.1. Set up the equation: [ 4x - 1 = -(3x - 6) ]2. Simplify and solve the equation:We'll implement these steps in Python using sympy.```pythonimport sympy as sp# Define the variablex = sp.symbols('x')# Define the expressionsexpr1 = 4*x - 1expr2 = 3*x - 6# Set up the equation where expr1 is the additive inverse of expr2equation = sp.Eq(expr1, -expr2)# Solve the equation for xsolution = sp.solve(equation, x)# Print the solutionprint(solution)``````output[1]```The value of (x) that makes the expressions (4x - 1) and (3x - 6) additive inverses of each other is (boxed{1}).

question:Tolya placed 101 coins in a row with denominations of 1, 2, and 3 kopecks. It turned out that there is at least one coin between any two one-kopeck coins, at least two coins between any two two-kopeck coins, and at least three coins between any two three-kopeck coins. How many three-kopeck coins could Tolya possibly have?

answer:To solve this problem, we need to account for the constraints given and determine the possible number of three-kopeck coins. Let's break it down into manageable parts:1. Constraints Analysis: - There is at least one coin between any two one-kopeck coins. - There are at least two coins between any two two-kopeck coins. - There are at least three coins between any two three-kopeck coins.2. Determine Placement: - Let ( n_1 ) be the number of 1-kopeck coins. - Let ( n_2 ) be the number of 2-kopeck coins. - Let ( n_3 ) be the number of 3-kopeck coins.3. Position Constraints: - For ( n_1 ) 1-kopeck coins, there need to be at least ( n_1 - 1 ) coins as separators. - For ( n_2 ) 2-kopeck coins, there need to be at least ( 2(n_2 - 1) ) coins as separators. - For ( n_3 ) 3-kopeck coins, there need to be at least ( 3(n_3 - 1) ) coins as separators.4. Total Coins: - The total number of coins is 101.5. Calculate Possible ( n_3 ): - We will determine the maximum number of 3-kopeck coins while satisfying all constraints.Let's use Python and sympy to find the maximum number of 3-kopeck coins with the given constraints.```pythonimport sympy as sp# Define the symbolsn1, n2, n3 = sp.symbols('n1 n2 n3')# Define the total number of coinstotal_coins = 101# Define the constraintsconstraint_1 = n1 - 1 # at least one coin between 1-kopeck coinsconstraint_2 = 2 * (n2 - 1) # at least two coins between 2-kopeck coinsconstraint_3 = 3 * (n3 - 1) # at least three coins between 3-kopeck coins# Total constrainttotal_constraint = n1 + n2 + n3 + constraint_1 + constraint_2 + constraint_3 - total_coins# Solve the inequality for n3solution = sp.solve(total_constraint, n3)print(solution)# Find integer solutionmax_n3 = -float('inf')for k in range(34): # Since we have 101 coins, the number of 3-kopeck coins must be less than or equal to 34 if total_constraint.subs({n1: 0, n2: 0, n3: k}) <= 0: max_n3 = kprint(max_n3)``````output[-n1/2 - 3*n2/4 + 107/4]26```Based on the output, the maximum number of three-kopeck coins (n_3) Tolya could possibly have is 26. Let's reason through the result to ensure it's correct.1. Constraints Recap: - There is at least 1 coin between any two 1-kopeck coins, requiring (n_1 - 1) separators. - There are at least 2 coins between any two 2-kopeck coins, requiring (2(n_2 - 1)) separators. - There are at least 3 coins between any two 3-kopeck coins, requiring (3(n_3 - 1)) separators.2. Total Number of Coins: - The total number of coins, including separators, must equal 101.3. Equation Formulation: [ n_1 + n_2 + n_3 + (n_1 - 1) + 2(n_2 - 1) + 3(n_3 - 1) = 101 ] Simplifying the equation: [ n_1 + n_2 + n_3 + n_1 - 1 + 2n_2 - 2 + 3n_3 - 3 = 101 ] [ 2n_1 + 3n_2 + 4n_3 - 6 = 101 ] [ 2n_1 + 3n_2 + 4n_3 = 107 ]4. Finding the Maximum (n_3): We solved for (n_3) using sympy and found the maximum integer value of (n_3) that satisfies the equation.Thus, the maximum number of three-kopeck coins Tolya could possibly have is:[boxed{26}]

Released under the MIT License.

has loaded